Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: 22 to ensure that the unjustly accused is not unjustly con- victed. tThe difference hetween the standards of probable cause and proof beyond reasonable doubt 30 great that it 15 unrcasonable to presume that person prose- cuted without probable cause risks conviction under the more stringent standard ir the absence of affirmative forts corrupt the trial process, The Constitution has been interpreted of course, to pr(} tect the accused from efforts to corrupt the truth-seeking process of the criminal justice system, See Brady Maryland, 373 U.S. (1963) (duty to disclose exculpa tory evidence); Arizona Youngbload, 488 U. (1988) (bad faith failure to preserve evidence violates due process) Indeed. the trial process was created prevent unjust convietions. The charging proceas by contrast, serves ...
(.png)
